Faculty Senate continues discussion on U.S. diversity requirement
Author: Jeff Budlong
This is an archived story. The content, links and information may have changed since the publication date.
Author: Jeff Budlong
The Faculty Senate discussed summer executive board changes to the number of learning outcomes students must achieve to fulfill the U.S. diversity requirement at its Oct. 12 meeting.
In May, the Faculty Senate approved four new learning outcomes for U.S. diversity courses and the requirement that students achieve all four. In July, the executive board met with provost's office staff and reached a compromise that three of the four objectives should be met.
The four learning outcomes are:
Faculty Senate secretary Annemarie Butler introduced a motion to rescind the executive board's amendment and return to the standards the senate passed in May. Several senators raised concerns about the executive board's action because the full senate had voted down the three-of-four objectives proposal at both its April and May meetings.
Senior vice president and provost Jonathan Wickert said two considerations cause concern about the number of learning objectives that must be met.
"We have concerns over House File 802 and the mandatory training component," Wickert said. "On the advice of counsel, we have concerns about the four out of four conflicting with the mandatory training part of that. I take the advice of counsel very seriously, as does President [Wintersteen]."
Having enough courses available to serve more than 5,000 students each year that meet all four requirements is another concern, Wickert said.
House File 802 prohibits public universities from conducting mandatory employee or student trainings that teach, advocate, act upon or promote 10 specific concepts defined in the law.
"This motion to rescind will harm every senator in this room, every faculty member and every student on campus," said Faculty Senate president Andrea Wheeler.
Because rescinding the amendment, or any similar action, she said, likely would lead to returning to Iowa State's previous U.S. diversity requirements, which date back to the 1990s.
Senators will vote on the motion to rescind at their Nov. 9 meeting.
Assistant provost for faculty development Tera Jordan spoke to Faculty Senate about opportunities to mentor faculty at the university. Jordan said the primary goal of faculty mentoring is to cultivate a university community in which the faculty thrive. That can lead to three positive outcomes:
Continuing to improve the required faculty mentoring program for all first-year, tenure-eligible faculty is key, Jordan said.
"What is new this year are faculty mentor resources," she said. "The goal is to raise the floor for the institution, and clarify for our faculty mentors their roles, responsibilities and expectations."
Providing faculty access to mentors as early as the hiring process, and continuing the service throughout their careers will help faculty retention, Jordan said. Recognizing the work of exceptional mentors keeps faculty engaged in that role.
Jordan pointed to three groups for whom optional mentoring opportunities could expand:
In other senate business:
Senators will vote at the November meeting on: